Report in The Sunday Times
According to a cable from Petrograd, the Russian offensive
is having a favourable effect on the general political situation. The leaders
of the social revolutionaries and the Minimalists – who represent the bulk of
the Russian Socialists – advocate the necessity of supporting the offensive and
suppressing anarchy. The hopes of many Russian Socialists, who expected the
German Socialists to accept the Russian peace terms, have been disappointed in
consequence of which they, too, have changed their attitude to the offensive,
says the Central News. On the other hand, the Bolsheviki, who have been
connected with the Anarchists, have recently lost ground owing to the
compromising relations of the latter with spies and criminals.
(Report in The Sunday Times)
3 July
Report in The Times
Owing to the general satisfaction now prevailing here the
efforts of extremist agitators to unite the population against the Government
and against the continuance of the war seem likely to result in total failure.
('Extremists at a Discount', The Times, from our own correspondent, Odessa)
4 July
Memoir by the Menshevik Nikolai Sukhanov
I went out into the street around 11 o’clock. At the first
glance it was obvious that the disorders had begun again. Clusters of people
were collecting everywhere and arguing violently. Half the shops were shut. The
trams had not been running since 8 o’clock that morning.
(N.N. Sukhanov, The Russian Revolution 1917: a Personal Record, Oxford 1955)
Diary entry of Joshua Butler Wright, Counselor of the American Embassy, Petrograd
Today seemed like a repetition of revolutionary days. The
‘Bolsheviks’, or extreme and anarchistic side, are in open revolt and up to
late in the afternoon were in almost complete control of the city. Kronstadt
sent its quota of sailors, too, which made matters very ugly and at 3.00 PM, as
dangerous a mob as I ever hope to see – composed of half-drunken sailors,
mutinous soldiers and armed civilians – paraded through our street, threatening
people at the windows, and drinking openly from bottles.
(Witness to Revolution: The Russian Revolution Diary and Letters of J. Butler Wright, London 2002)
Diary entry of Louis de Robien, attaché at the French Embassy
Liteiny Street was a heartrending sight: dead horses, their
skins taut and shining from the shower that had just fallen, lay in the wet
roadway between the pools of water, some of which were tinged with red … A lot
of inquisitive people had already gathered to rob the horses of their harness,
but we did not see any more armed men. Neither did we see any dead or wounded:
we are told that there are a great number of them, which seems probable
considering the number of horses killed.
(Louis de Robien, The Diary of a Diplomat in Russia 1917-1918, London 1969)
Letter from Aleksei Peshkov [Maxim Gorky] to his wife E.P. Peshkova from Petrograd
Matters are becoming more and more muddled, and it’s
becoming more and more obvious that a civil conflict is inevitable here. To
judge by the mood, the fighting promises to be brutal. There are meetings on
the streets at night and a wild fury has flared up. Counter-revolutionary
forces are actively organising themselves, while the revolutionaries just spout
rhetoric. In general, things aren’t too cheerful … That fool Burtsev has
announced in the newspapers that he will soon identify a provocateur and spy whose name will ‘stun the whole world’. The
public has already started to speculate and has guessed that the person in
question is M. Gorky. You think I’m joking? Not in the least. I’m already
getting letters with salutations such as ‘to the traitor Judas, chief German
spy and provocateur’ … Oh, how hard it is to live in Russia! How foolish we all
are, how fantastically foolish!
(Maksim Gorky: Selected Letters, Oxford 1997)
Memoir of Princess Paley
The Bolshevist proceedings made us tremble for the life of
the imprisoned Sovereigns. Everything was disorganised – the army had gone,
honour had gone. The Revolutionaries had realised that if the army had remained
intact, the Revolution sooner or later would come to an end. To save the
Revolution they sacrificed the army. What remorse, what terrible feelings of
guilt men’s consciences have to bear! But the Russian Revolutionaries have no
conscience!
(Princess Paley, Memories of Russia, 1916-1919 , London 1924)
5 July
Diary entry of Joshua Butler Wright, Counselor of the American Embassy, Petrograd
No definite news as to casualties of last night. One hundred
and eighty ‘Bolsheviks’ rumoured killed … Public sentiment is suddenly turning
against these extremists.
(Witness to Revolution: The Russian Revolution Diary and Letters of J. Butler Wright, London 2002)
Diary entry of Louis de Robien, attaché at the French Embassy
The streets are deserted, and the town is a dead
place. It is raining.
(Louis de Robien, The Diary of a Diplomat in Russia 1917-1918, London 1969)
Memoir of Count Benckendorff
Prince Lvov, having resigned, for several days we were
without Government, and Kerensky had taken refuge with his family in the Grand
Palais at Tsarskoe, giving dinners at the expense of the Court, driving about
Pavlovsk in the Emperor’s carriage.
(Sergei Mironenko, A Lifelong Passion, London 1996)
7 July
Memoir of Manchester Guardian correspondent M. Philips Price
As usually happens, when the political atmosphere is charged, a spark from any quarter sets the magazine alight. There was in Petrograd at this moment a number of forty-year-old soldiers, who had been released for field work in the northern provinces. They had been ordered to return to take part in the offensive. Imagine the effect that this order of the Coalition Government had on these men. After three years of suffering and misery in fighting for hated Tsarism, they had been told that peace was at hand. A few days in their home, working at the harvest, in their domestic haunts with their families, had but whetted their appetite for peace. Now suddenly they were ordered to return without any hope being offered them that the end of the war was within measurable distance. It is necessary to understand the psychology of these men in order to grasp the true significance of what happened afterwards in Petrograd and in other parts of the country. Out on the streets these forty-year-old soldiers, together with the machine gun division, went, spurred on by a blind feeling that they must have it out with their rulers, who had betrayed them.
(M. Philips Price, My Reminiscences of the Russian Revolution, London 1921)
Letter to the All-Russian Central Executive Committee of
Soviets from the peasant Ivan Pastukhov, Vologda Province
Citizens of our Great Russia, workers’ and soldiers’ deputies,
We, the peasants of Vologda Province, beg you to help our
families in their time of Need since we, their fathers, were drafted into
military service and got sick in the service: some have rheumatism, some
typhus, any and every kind of sickness; we can’t work at all, the hayfield goes
uncultivated, there is no life-sustaining food at all, and all because of the
war. Comrades, we beg of you, end this bloody drama as soon as possible. It
isn’t a war – it’s the extermination of the people.
(Mark D. Steinberg, Voices of Revolution, 1917, New Haven and London 2001)
Kerensky was furious that the government had not been able to take control of the situation during his absence at the front. He was determined that its replacement, formed on 7 July, under his premiership and supplanting a demoralised Prince Lvov, would be allowed 'dictatorial powers in order to bring the army back to discipline'. ... Retaining his role as Minister of War, Kerensky appointed as commander-in-chief of the army General Kornilov, whose immediate response was to call for the restoration of courts martial and capital punishment for desertion at the front.
(Helen Rappaport, Caught in the Revolution, London 2017)
8 July 2017
I’ve probably been studying Russian history since about 14
(further confirmation, in my children’s eyes, of a truly ‘sad’ childhood), but
I had failed to clock that the October revolution could so easily have been the
July revolution. China Miéville paints a vivid picture in his book October
of the events in early July, as reflected in this week’s
extracts. There seem to be so many disparate elements struggling for control:
the First Machine Gunners regiment, different factions within the Bolsheviks, the
Kronstadt sailors, the increasingly precarious Coalition Government, still
being propped up by the Soviet in the Tauride Palace as it pursued its own line.
Everyone jostling to control events that
seemed to change direction by the minute.
At 7.45pm on 3 July a truck
‘bristling with weapons’ drove up to the Baltic Station in Petrograd to
intercept and arrest Kerensky – but missed him by minutes. Lenin was still in
Finland but returned early the following morning. His address to the
demonstrators was ‘uncharacteristically brimstone free’: he felt it was too
soon for the decisive moment. In the afternoon of 4 July, the mood turned
increasingly violent. As the demonstrators converged on the Tauride Palace and
one of the Soviet leaders, Chernov, came out to address them, a worker shook
his fist in his face and bellowed, ‘Take power, you son of a bitch, when it’s
given to you!’ According to Miéville the heat was taken out of the
revolutionary fervour by a rumour initiated by the government that they had
evidence of Lenin’s links with Germany – that the Bolshevik leader was essentially
a German spy. The rumours were never corroborated, and eventually suppressed,
but it’s interesting how political upheaval breeds such accusations, and how ‘the
enemy within’, whether from Germany then or Russia now, remains a powerful
image.
8 October
Letter from Lenin to the Bolshevik Comrades attending the Regional Congress of
the Soviets of the Northern Region
Comrades, Our revolution is passing through a highly critical period …
A gigantic task is being imposed upon the responsible leaders of our Party,
failure to perform which will involve the danger of a total collapse of the
internationalist proletarian movement. The situation is such that verily,
procrastination is like unto death … In the vicinity of Petrograd and in
Petrograd itself — that is where the insurrection can, and must, be decided on
and effected … The fleet, Kronstadt, Viborg, Reval, can and must advance
on Petrograd; they must smash the Kornilov regiments, rouse both the capitals,
start a mass agitation for a government which will immediately give the land to
the peasants and immediately make proposals for peace, and must overthrow
Kerensky’s government and establish such a government. Verily, procrastination
is like unto death.
(V.I. Lenin and Joseph Stalin, The Russian Revolution: Writings and Speeches
from the February Revolution to the October Revolution, 1917, London 1938)
9 October
Report in The Times
The Maximalist [Bolshevik], M. Trotsky, President of the Petrograd Soviet,
made a violent attack on the Government, describing it as irresponsible and
assailing its bourgeois elements, ‘who,’ he continued, ‘by their attitude are
causing insurrection among the peasants, increasing disorganisation and trying
to render the Constituent Assembly abortive.’ ‘The Maximalists,’ he declared,
‘cannot work with the Government or with the Preliminary Parliament, which I am
leaving in order to say to the workmen, soldiers, and peasants that Petrograd,
the Revolution, and the people are in danger.’ The Maximalists then left the
Chamber, shouting, ‘Long live a democratic and honourable peace! Long live the
Constituent Assembly!’
(‘Opening of Preliminary Parliament’, The Times)
10 October
As Sukhanov left his home for the Soviet on the morning of the 10th, his
wife Galina Flakserman eyed nasty skies and made him promise not to try to
return that night, but to stay at his office … Unlike her diarist husband,
who was previously an independent and had recently joined the Menshevik left,
Galina Flakserman was a long-time Bolshevik activist, on the staff of Izvestia.
Unbeknownst to him, she had quietly informed her comrades that comings and
goings at her roomy, many-entranced apartment would be unlikely to draw
attention. Thus, with her husband out of the way, the Bolshevik CC came
visiting. At least twelve of the twenty-one-committee were there … There
entered a clean-shaven, bespectacled, grey-haired man, ‘every bit like a
Lutheran minister’, Alexandra Kollontai remembered. The CC stared at the
newcomer. Absent-mindedly, he doffed his wig like a hat, to reveal a familiar
bald pate. Lenin had arrived.
(China Miéville, October: The Story of the Russian Revolution, London 2017)
Memoir by the Menshevik Nikolai
Sukhanov
Oh, the novel jokes of the merry muse of History! This supreme and decisive
session took place in my own home … without my knowledge … For such a
cardinal session not only did people come from Moscow, but the Lord of Hosts
himself, with his henchman, crept out of the underground. Lenin appeared in a
wig, but without his beard. Zinoviev appeared with a beard, but without his
shock of hair. The meeting went on for about ten hours, until about 3 o’clock
in the morning … However, I don’t actually know much about the exact
course of this meeting, or even about its outcome. It’s clear that the question
of an uprising was put … It was decided to begin the uprising as quickly
as possible, depending on circumstances but not on the Congress.
(N.N. Sukhanov, The Russian Revolution 1917: a Personal Record, Oxford 1955)
11 October
British Consul Arthur Woodhouse in a letter home
Things are coming to a pretty pass here. I confess I should like to be out
of it, but this is not the time to show the white feather. I could not ask for
leave now, no matter how imminent the danger. There are over 1,000 Britishers
here still, and I and my staff may be of use and assistance to them in an
emergency.
(Helen Rappaport, Caught in the Revolution: Petrograd 1917, London 2017)
Memoir of Fedor Raskolnikov, naval
cadet at Kronstadt
The proximity of a proletarian rising in Russia, as prologue to the world
socialist revolution, became the subject of all our discussions in
prison … Even behind bars, in a stuffy, stagnant cell, we felt instinctively
that the superficial calm that outwardly seemed to prevail presaged an
approaching storm … At last, on October 11, my turn [for release]
came … Stepping out of the prison on to the Vyborg-Side embankment and
breathing in deeply the cool evening breeze that blew from the river, I felt
that joyous sense of freedom which is known only to those who have learnt to
value it while behind bards. I took a tram at the Finland Station and quickly
reached Smolny … In the mood of the delegates to the Congress of Soviets
of the Northern Region which was taking place at that time .. an unusual
elation, an extreme animation was noticeable … They told me straightaway
that the CC had decided on armed insurrection. But there was a group of
comrades, headed by Zinoviev and Kamenev, who did not agree with this decision
and regarded a rising a premature and doomed to defeat.
(F.F. Raskolnikov, Kronstadt and Petrograd in 1917, New York 1982, first
published 1925)
12 October
Sir George Buchanan, British Ambassador to Russia
On [Kerensky] expressing the fear that there was a strong anti-Russian
feeling both in England and France, I said that though the British public was
ready to make allowances for her difficulties, it was but natural that they
should, after the fall of Riga, have abandoned all hope of her continuing to
take an active part in the war … Bolshevism was at the root of all the
evils from which Russia was suffering, and if he would but eradicate it he
would go down to history, not only as the leading figure of the revolution, but
as the saviour of his country. Kerensky admitted the truth of what I had said,
but contended that he could not do this unless the Bolsheviks themselves
provoked the intervention of the Government by an armed uprising.
(Sir George Buchanan, My Mission to Russia, London 1923)
13 October
Diary entry of Louis de Robien, attaché at the French Embassy
Kerensky is becoming more and more unpopular, in spite of certain grotesque
demonstrations such as this one: the inhabitants of a district in Central
Russia have asked him to take over the supreme religious power, and want to
make him into a kind of Pope as well as a dictator, whereas even the Tsar was
really neither one nor the other. Nobody takes him seriously, except in the
Embassy. A rather amusing sonnet about him has appeared, dedicated to the beds
in the Winter Palace, and complaining that they are reserved for hysteria
cases … for Alexander Feodorovich (Kerensky’s first names) and then
Alexandra Feodorovna (the Empress).
(Louis de Robien, The Diary of a Diplomat in Russia 1917–1918, London 1969)
14 October 2017
The BBC2 semi-dramatisation of how the Bolsheviks took power, shown this week,
was a curious thing. Talking heads in the form of Figes, Mieville, Rappaport,
Sebag-Montefiore, Tariq Ali, Martin Amis and others were interspersed with
moody reconstructions of late-night meetings, and dramatic moments such as
Lenin’s unbearded return to the Bolshevik CC (cf Sukhanov above). The programme
felt rather staged and unconvincing, with a lot of agonised expressions and
fist-clenching by Lenin, but the reviewers liked it. Odd, though, that
Eisenstein’s storming of the Winter Palace is rolled out every time, with a
brief disclaimer that it’s a work of fiction and yet somehow presented as
historical footage. There’s a sense of directorial sleight of hand, as if the
rather prosaic taking of the palace desperately needs a re-write. In some
supra-historical way, Eisenstein’s version has become the accepted version.
John Reed’s Ten Days that Shook the World
, currently being
serialised on Radio 4, is also presented with tremendous vigour, and properly
so as the book is nothing if not dramatic. Historical truth, though, is often
as elusive in a book that was originally published — in 1919 — with an
introduction by Lenin. ‘Reed was not’, writes one reviewer, ‘an ideal observer.
He knew little Russian, his grasp of events was sometimes shaky, and his facts
were often suspect.’ Still, that puts him in good company, and Reed is
undoubtedly a good read.